However, I keep running into limitations of the Elements version (I'm not methodical enough to keep a record of these!) and thought I'd give Musescore another try after reading something on the Dorico forum that basically accused Musescore of nicking a lot of ideas from Dorico.! I have to say at first I found Dorico very powerful, and fairly easy to get around, or at least to find the ways to get around, whereas my memory of Sib was of searching fruitlessly for different options that in my view should have been grouped together.
#DORICO HIDE EMPTY STAVES PRO#
Having found Sibelius impenetrable years ago, Notion not full-featured enough, and Guitar Pro too limited for general composition work (I had used Musescore many years ago, so did not consider it when starting to score more seriously), I'm now at the point where, preparing a musical for publication, the limitations of Dorico Elements are becoming very apparent. I have been using Dorico Elements for a year or so.
I can't tell whether the special feature of Dorico is supposed to be that it can combine the stems in that odd way, or what - in any event it is a very misleading advert for Dorico.Ĭan someone give a quick rundown on the actual state of currently available programs (normally spelled like that, even in British English) I thought Sibelius more or less died when the team went off to Dorico.
I also see the truly bizarre illustration given on the WP page of how Dorico "supports complex musical notation", which is a particularly hard-to-read version of Chopin's Ballade number 4. I wonder how widely that view would be accepted? I am a sporadic user of MS, and am quite contented with what it can produce I wonder if there is any meaning to "professional level" other than "costs money". However, the only one of the three under significant development is Dorico." "There are now three ‘professional-level’ notation programmes available: Sibelius Ultimate, Finale and Dorico.
The Wikipedia article on Dorico has a quote from some review:
0 kommentar(er)
